[Recommendations for Primary Health Care for transgender people]. / Recomendaciones para la atención de la salud en Atención Primaria de las personas transgénero.

The WHO defines Primary Health Care as essential health care, based on practical, scientifically founded and socially acceptable methods and technologies, made available to all individuals and families in the community, through their full participation, and at a cost that the community and the country can bear, at each and every stage of their development, in a spirit of self-responsibility and self-determination. With the intention of fulfilling the basic objective of caring for and promoting health in all the groups that make up our current society, the need arises to focus on certain groups in which the actions of Primary Care are currently consensual or poorly protocolised, as is the case with the health care of transgender people.

Impacto de la pandemia por COVID-19 sobre un programa de consulta electrónica universal (e-consulta) entre médicos de Atención Primaria y cardiólogos / Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic above a universal electronic consultation program (e-consultation) between general practitioners and cardiologists

Introducción y objetivos Los programas de telemedicina entre clínico y paciente se han desarrollado con fuerza durante la pandemia de enfermedad por COVID-19, pero no hay datos de experiencias entre clínicos. Nuestro objetivo es analizar el impacto de la pandemia por COVID-19 en la actividad y resultados en salud de un programa de consulta electrónica universal (e-consulta) para todas las derivaciones de pacientes entre médicos de atención primaria y el Servicio de Cardiología de nuestra área. Métodos Analizamos mediante regresión logística a 25.121 pacientes con al menos una e-consulta entre 2018 y 2021 realizada con el Servicio de Cardiología de nuestra área sanitaria. También se realizó el análisis de regresión logística del impacto de la pandemia por COVID-19 sobre la resolución de la e-consulta y tiempo de espera de la atención, hospitalizaciones y mortalidad, tomando como referencia las consultas realizadas durante 2018. Resultados Observamos que una menor demora en la atención y resolución de la e-consulta (sin necesidad de atención presencial) se asociaba a un mejor pronóstico. Los períodos de pandemia COVID-19 presentaron similares resultados a los del 2018. Conclusiones Los resultados de nuestro estudio muestran una significativa reducción de las derivaciones a través de e-consulta durante el primer año de la pandemia por COVID-19 con recuperación posterior de la demanda asistencial sin que los períodos de pandemia se asociasen con peores resultados en salud. La reducción del tiempo de demora de resolución de la e-consulta y el grupo sin necesidad de consulta presencial se asociaron a un mejor pronóstico (AU)

Blackground and objective Virtual healthcare models, usually between healthcare professionals and patients, have developed strongly during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, but there are not data of models between clinicians. Our objective is to analyse the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the activity and health outcomes of the universal e-consultation program for patient referrals between primary care physicians and the Cardiology Department in our area. Methods Patients with at least one e-consultation between 2018 and 2021 were selected. We analysed the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on activity and waiting time for care, hospitalizations and mortality, taking as a reference the consultations carried out during 2018. Results We analysed 25,121 patients. Through logistic regression analysis, it was observed that a shorter delay in care and resolution of the e-consultation without the need for face-to-face care were associated with a better prognosis. The COVID-19 pandemic periods (2019-2020 and 2020-2021) were not associated with worse health outcomes compared to 2018. Conclusions The results of our study show a significant reduction in e-consult referrals during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic with a subsequent recovery in the demand for care without the pandemic periods being associated with worse outcomes. The reduction in the time elapsed for solving the e-consult and no need for in-person visit were associated with better outcomes (AU)

[Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic above a universal electronic consultation program (e-consultation) between general practitioners and cardiologists]. / Impacto de la pandemia por COVID-19 sobre un programa de consulta electrónica universal (e-consulta) entre médicos de Atención Primaria y cardiólogos.

Blackground and objective: Virtual healthcare models, usually between healthcare professionals and patients, have developed strongly during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, but there are not data of models between clinicians. Our objective is to analyse the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the activity and health outcomes of the universal e-consultation program for patient referrals between primary care physicians and the Cardiology Department in our area. Methods: Patients with at least one e-consultation between 2018 and 2021 were selected. We analysed the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on activity and waiting time for care, hospitalizations and mortality, taking as a reference the consultations carried out during 2018. Results: We analysed 25,121 patients. Through logistic regression analysis, it was observed that a shorter delay in care and resolution of the e-consultation without the need for face-to-face care were associated with a better prognosis. The COVID-19 pandemic periods (2019-2020 and 2020-2021) were not associated with worse health outcomes compared to 2018. Conclusions: The results of our study show a significant reduction in e-consult referrals during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic with a subsequent recovery in the demand for care without the pandemic periods being associated with worse outcomes. The reduction in the time elapsed for solving the e-consult and no need for in-person visit were associated with better outcomes.

Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic upon a universal electronic consultation program (e-consultation) between general practitioners and cardiologists.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Virtual healthcare models, usually between healthcare professionals and patients, have developed strongly during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, but there are no data corresponding to models between clinicians. An analysis was made of the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic upon the activity and health outcomes of the universal e-consultation program for patient referrals between primary care physicians and the Cardiology Department in our healthcare area. METHODS: Patients with at least one e-consultation between 2018 and 2021 were selected. We analyzed the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic upon activity and waiting time for care, hospitalizations and mortality, taking as reference the consultations carried out during 2018. RESULTS: A total of 25,121 patients were analyzed. Logistic regression analysis showed a shorter delay in care and resolution of the e-consultation without the need for face-to-face care to be associated to a better prognosis. The COVID-19 pandemic periods (2019-2020 and 2020-2021) were not associated to poorer health outcomes compared to 2018. CONCLUSIONS: The results of our study show a significant reduction in e-consultation referrals during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic, with a subsequent recovery in the demand for care, and without the pandemic periods being associated to poorer outcomes. The reduction in time elapsed for resolving the e-consultations and no need for face-to-face visits were associated to improved outcomes.

Efecto en la vida real sobre el control de los factores de riesgo asociado al inicio con polipíldora cardiovascular a partir de fármacos equipotentes / Real-life effect on the control of risk factors associated with initiation of the cardiovascular polypill created from equipotent drugs

Objetivo: Analizar el impacto del inicio del tratamiento con la polipíldora-cardiovascular (CV) del Centro Nacional de Investigaciones Cardiovasculares (CNIC-Ferrer), en las cifras de presión arterial (PA) y colesterol ligado a lipoproteínas de baja densidad (LDL), de los pacientes de nuestra área sanitaria que previamente recibían dosis equipotentes de estatinas y antihipertensivos. Material y métodos: Se registraron todos los pacientes de nuestra área sanitaria (Santiago de Compostela) que a 31 de diciembre de 2019 tenían una prescripción activa de polipíldora-CV (CNIC-Ferrer), desde el 16 de enero de 2015. La fecha índice fue la fecha de inicio de prescripción de polipíldora-CV, y se analizaron los fármacos que previamente recibía el paciente para dislipemia e hipertensión arterial, clasificándose por equipotencias con atorvastatina y ramipril. Se analizó mediante la prueba t-Student para muestras apareadas las variaciones de colesterol LDL y PA. Resultados: Analizamos 547 pacientes con una edad media de 71,5±11,5 años y la mayoría varones (60,6%). Observamos un descenso del colesterol LDL (−10,6 [IC95%: −7,0, −14,3], p<0,001) en los pacientes (n=471) que iniciaron la polipíldora-CV con dosis previas equipotentes de atorvastatina. Documentamos una reducción de la PA sistólica (−3,7 [IC95%: −0,4, −6,9], p=0,029) en los pacientes (n=360) con inicio a partir de dosis equipotentes de ramipril. En 88 pacientes, el inicio de la polipíldora-CV se hizo a partir de dosis equipotentes de atorvastatina y ramipril observándose un descenso del colesterol LDL (−8,7 [IC95%: −3,8, −13,6], p=0,001) y de la PA sistólica (−3,6 [IC95%: −7,8, 0,5], p=0,085). Conclusiones: El inicio del tratamiento con la polipíldora-CV, en pacientes que previamente recibían tratamientos equipotentes de atorvastatina y ramipril, se asoció a una mayor reducción del colesterol LDL y la PA sistólica (AU)

Objective: This work aims to analyze the impact of Spain's National Center for Cardiovascular Research (CNIC-Ferrer)’s cardiovascular (CV)-polypill on blood pressure (BP) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (cLDL) levels in patients in our healthcare area who previously took equipotent doses of statins and antihypertensives. Material and methods: All patients in our healthcare area (Santiago de Compostela, Spain) who, as of December 31, 2019, had an active prescription for the CV-polypill (CNIC-Ferrer) since January 16, 2015 were registered. The index date was the start date of the CV-polypill prescription. The drugs the patient had previously received for dyslipidemia and hypertension were analyzed, classifying them by their equivalent potency to atorvastatin and ramipril. Changes in cLDL and BP were analyzed by means of Student's t-test for paired samples. Results: We analyzed 547 patients with a mean age of 71.5±11.5 years. The majority were men (60.6%). We observed a decrease in cLDL (−10.6 [95% CI: −7.0, −14.3], p<.001) in patients who started taking the CV-polypill who had previously taken equally potent doses of atorvastatin (n=471). We documented a reduction in systolic BP (−3.7 [95% CI: −0.4, −6.9], p=.029) in patients who had previously taken equally potent doses of ramipril (n=360). In 88 patients, the CV-polypill was started via equally potent doses of atorvastatin and ramipril, with a decrease in cLDL (−8.7 [95% CI: −3.8, −13.6], p=.001) and systolic BP (−3.6 [95% CI: −7.8, 0.5], p=.085). Conclusions: The initiation of treatment with the CV-polypill in patients who previously received equally potent treatment with atorvastatin and ramipril was associated with a greater reduction in cLDL and systolic BP (AU)

Programa de consulta electrónica universal (e-consulta) de un servicio de cardiología. Resultados a largo plazo / Universal electronic consultation (e-consultation) program of a cardiology service. Long-term results

Introducción y objetivos: Muchos sistemas sanitarios han iniciado programas de consulta electrónica, aunque poco se conoce de su impacto en acceso, seguridad y satisfacción. El objetivo de este estudio es evaluar el impacto clínico de la puesta en marcha de un modelo de atención ambulatoria que incluye una consulta electrónica (e-consulta) inicial comparándolo con un modelo presencial de acto único. Métodos: Se seleccionó a pacientes con al menos 1 consulta al servicio de cardiología entre 2010 y 2019. Mediante un modelo de regresión de series temporales interrumpidas, se analizó el impacto de la incorporación de la e-consulta en el modelo asistencial (iniciado en 2013), evaluando: tiempo de espera de la atención, asistencias a urgencias, ingresos hospitalarios y mortalidad. Resultados: Se analizó a 47.377 pacientes: el 61,9% de ellos atendidos incorporando la e-consulta y el 38,1% en el modelo de consulta presencial de acto único. La mediana [intervalo intercuartílico] de la demora a la atención en el modelo de e-consulta, 7 [5-13] días, fue menor que en el modelo presencial: 33 [14-81] días (p<0,001). El modelo de regresión para series temporales interrumpidas mostró que la incorporación de la e-consulta aporta una disminución muy importante en la demora de la atención, que se mantiene en torno a los 9 días, aunque con ligeras oscilaciones. Los pacientes valorados vía e-consulta tuvieron menos ingresos hospitalarios (el 0,9 frente al 1,2%; p=0,0017) y mortalidad (el 2,5 frente al 3,9%; p<0,001). Conclusiones: Un programa de atención ambulatoria que incluye una e-consulta ha mostrado importantes reducciones en los tiempos de espera y es un modelo seguro, con menores tasas de ingresos hospitalarios y mortalidad en el primer año (AU)

Introduction and objectives: Many health systems have initiated electronic consultation (e-consultation) programs, although little is known about their impact on accessibility, safety, and satisfaction. The aim of this study was to assess the clinical impact of the implementation of an outpatient care model that includes an initial e-consultation and to compare it with a one-time face-to-face consultation model. Methods: We selected patients who visited the cardiology service at least once between 2010 and 2019. Using an interrupted time series regression model, we analyzed the impact of incorporating e-consultation into the health care model (started in 2013), and evaluated waiting times, emergency services, hospital admissions, and mortality. Results: We analyzed 47 377 patients: 61.9% were attended in e-consultation and 38.1% in one-time face-to-face consultations. The waiting time for care was shorter in the e-consultation model (median [IQR]: 7 [5-13] days) than in the face-to-face model (median [IQR]: 33 [14-81] days), P<.001. The interrupted time series regression model showed that the introduction of e-consultation substantially decreased waiting times, which held steady at around 9 days, although with slight oscillations. Patients evaluated via e-consultation had fewer hospital admissions (0.9% vs 1.2%, P=.0017) and lower mortality (2.5% vs 3.9%, P<.001). Conclusions: An outpatient care program that includes an e-consultation reduced waiting times significantly and was safe, with a lower rate of hospital admissions and mortality in the first year (AU)

Real-life effect on the control of risk factors associated with initiation of the cardiovascular polypill created from equipotent drugs.

OBJECTIVE: This work aims to analyze the impact of Spain's National Center for Cardiovascular Research (CNIC-Ferrer)'s cardiovascular (CV)-polypill on blood pressure (BP) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (cLDL) levels in patients in our healthcare area who previously took equipotent doses of statins and antihypertensives. MATERIAL AND METHODS: All patients in our healthcare area (Santiago de Compostela, Spain) who, as of December 31, 2019, had an active prescription for the CV-polypill (CNIC-Ferrer) since January 16, 2015 were registered. The index date was the start date of the CV-polypill prescription. The drugs the patient had previously received for dyslipidemia and hypertension were analyzed, classifying them by their equivalent potency to atorvastatin and ramipril. Changes in cLDL and BP were analyzed by means of Student's t-test for paired samples. RESULTS: We analyzed 547 patients with a mean age of 71.5 ± 11.5 years. The majority were men (60.6%). We observed a decrease in cLDL (-10.6 [95% CI: -7.0, -14.3], p < 0.001) in patients who started taking the CV-polypill who had previously taken equally potent doses of atorvastatin (n = 471). We documented a reduction in systolic BP (-3.7 [95% CI: -0.4, -6.9], p = 0.029) in patients who had previously taken equally potent doses of ramipril (n = 360). In 88 patients, the CV-polypill was started via equally potent doses of atorvastatin and ramipril, with a decrease in cLDL (-8.7 [95% CI: -3.8, -13.6], p = 0.001) and systolic BP (-3.6 [95% CI: -7.8, 0.5], p = 0.085). CONCLUSIONS: The initiation of treatment with the CV-polypill in patients who previously received equally potent treatment with atorvastatin and ramipril was associated with a greater reduction in cLDL and systolic BP.

Conocimiento y experiencia en violencia de género de las/os tutoras/es médicas/os y residentes de medicina de familia de Galicia / Knowledge and experience in gender violence of tutors and trainees of Galicia family medicine

OBJETIVO: Analizar el nivel de preparación, conocimiento y experiencia sobre la violencia de género de las/os tutoras/es médicas/os y las/os residentes de medicina de familia de las Unidades Docentes de Atención Familiar y Comunitaria de Galicia. MÉTODO: Estudio descriptivo transversal en las siete Unidades Docentes de Atención Familiar y Comunitaria de Galicia. Se utilizó el cuestionario Physician Readiness Manage Intimate Violence Survey (PREMIS), en su versión validada en español. Esta encuesta permite recoger información de las/os profesionales sanitarios de atención primaria sobre sus actitudes, conocimientos y prácticas con respecto a la violencia de género. Se realizó análisis estadístico descriptivo y comparativo de los datos. RESULTADOS: Se recibieron 159 cuestionarios, 72,32% procedían de mujeres, 59,1% de las respuestas fueron de médicas/os tutoras/es. Se apreció que existían diferencias estadísticamente significativas en la detección/diagnóstico de violencia a favor que aquellas/os profesionales que tenían conocimiento del protocolo de violencia de género o que habían recibido formación sobre esta materia (p < 0,01). En la autopercepción de la formación sobre violencia de género se observaron peores resultados con significación estadística en aquellas/os profesionales con mayor carga asistencial (p < 0,05). CONCLUSIONES: Haber recibido formación o conocer el protocolo de atención sanitaria se asocia con una mayor detección de casos de violencia de género. Se ha constatado déficit en formación en violencia de género tanto en tutoras/es como en residentes de medicina de familia, especialmente en los que tienen mayor carga asistencial, por lo que es una prioridad desarrollar estrategias de formación médica en este campo

OBJECTIVE: To analyse the level of preparation, knowledge and experience of gender violence of medical tutors and family medicine trainees of the Teaching Units of Family and Community Care of Galicia. METHODS: Descriptive cross-sectional study conducted in the 7 Teaching Units of Family and Community Care in Galicia. The Physician Readiness Manage Intimate Violence Survey (PREMIS), in its validated version in Spanish was used. This survey allows the collection of information from primary health care professionals about their attitudes, knowledge, and practices as regards gender violence. A descriptive and comparative statistical analysis was performed on the data. RESULTS: Out of a total of 159 questionnaires received, 72.32% came from women, and 59.1% of the responses were from doctors / tutors. It was noted that there were statistically significant differences in the detection / diagnosis of violence by those professionals who were aware of the gender violence protocol or who had received training in this area (P<.01). In the self-perception of gender violence training, statistically significant worse results were observed in those professionals with greater care burden (P<.05). CONCLUSIONS: Having received training or knowing the health care protocol on gender violence is associated with greater detection of cases of gender violence. There has been a deficit in training in gender-based violence both in tutors and in family medicine residents, especially in those with greater care burden, so it is a priority to develop medical training strategies in this field

[Analysis on the impact of the introduction of a quality management plan of the diabetes care process in a Health Area of Galicia (Spain)]. / Análisis del impacto de la implantación del plan de gestión de calidad del proceso asistencial de diabetes en un Área Sanitaria de Galicia.

OBJECTIVE: To analyse the impact of a management plan for the diabetes process on the level of control of HbA1c and the rate of hypoglycaemia. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The Health Area had a catchment population of 446,603. An anti-diabetic drug prescription (29,705 patients) was used to select diabetic patients. The variables recorded were: percentage of patients with HbA1c <8% and the hypoglycaemia rate before and after implementation of the quality program. RESULTS: The prevalence of diabetes was 11.8%, with 71.3% of them receiving some pharmacological treatment. In the year 2016, in the Integrated Health Area of Santiago de Compostela (Spain), 59.6% (95% CI: 57.9% -61.2%) of the patients had an HbA1c of less than 8%. After the implementation of the quality program, there was an increase in the number of controlled patients, reaching 63.6% (IRQ: 16.0%) in 2017, and 63.8% (95% CI: 62.5% - 65.2%) in 2018. The annual rate of hypoglycaemia increased non-significantly from 2.8 (95% CI: 2.22-3.35) in 2016, to 2.94 (95% CI: 2.35-2.35) in 2017 (P=.083), and 3.0 (95% CI: 2.44-3.56) in 2018 (P=.399). CONCLUSIONS: The implementation of the diabetes process management program enabled the level of control of HbA1c to be improved, as well as increase the percentage of patients who undergo regular check-ups, without increasing hypoglycaemia.

[Knowledge And Experience In Gender Violence Of Tutors And Trainees Of Galicia Family Medicine]. / Conocimiento y experiencia en violencia de género de las/os tutoras/es médicas/os y residentes de medicina de familia de Galicia.

OBJECTIVE: To analyse the level of preparation, knowledge and experience of gender violence of medical tutors and family medicine trainees of the Teaching Units of Family and Community Care of Galicia. METHODS: Descriptive cross-sectional study conducted in the 7 Teaching Units of Family and Community Care in Galicia. The Physician Readiness Manage Intimate Violence Survey (PREMIS), in its validated version in Spanish was used. This survey allows the collection of information from primary health care professionals about their attitudes, knowledge, and practices as regards gender violence. A descriptive and comparative statistical analysis was performed on the data. RESULTS: Out of a total of 159 questionnaires received, 72.32% came from women, and 59.1% of the responses were from doctors / tutors. It was noted that there were statistically significant differences in the detection / diagnosis of violence by those professionals who were aware of the gender violence protocol or who had received training in this area (P<.01). In the self-perception of gender violence training, statistically significant worse results were observed in those professionals with greater care burden (P<.05). CONCLUSIONS: Having received training or knowing the health care protocol on gender violence is associated with greater detection of cases of gender violence. There has been a deficit in training in gender-based violence both in tutors and in family medicine residents, especially in those with greater care burden, so it is a priority to develop medical training strategies in this field.

Experiencia en la asistencia de pacientes ancianos con COVID-19 e institucionalizados: una estrategia de aislamiento y un decálogo de recomendaciones para la comunicación de malas noticias por vía telefónica / Experience in the care of elderly institutionalised patients COVID-19: an isolation strategy and a decalogue of recommendations for the communication of bad news by telephone

No disponible

Perfil del médico de familia que accede a plazas con tutoría docente de Medicina Familiar y Comunitaria mediante concurso de traslados en Galicia / Profile of the Family Doctor who gains access to positions with teaching tutorship of Family and Community Medicine by means of relocation examination in Galicia

OBJETIVO: Analizar el perfil de los médicos de familia que accedieron a plazas, tanto del cupo general como reservadas para tutores de medicina familiar y comunitaria, mediante concurso de traslados. MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS: Estudio observacional descriptivo. Se establecieron 2 grupos de comparación: en el grupo No Docencia se incluyeron médicos de familia que no solicitaron o no accedieron a plazas de tutoría y en el grupo Docencia, a los que accedieron a plazas reservadas para tutoría. La información se obtuvo de las puntuaciones del concurso de traslados realizado en Galicia en 2018. Se incluyeron 426 médicos de familia que se inscribieron en el concurso: 301 mujeres (70,7%) y 125 hombres (29,3%). Las variables fueron la obtención de plaza con reserva para tutores, el género y los méritos considerados en el concurso: experiencia profesional, formación, publicaciones científicas y lengua gallega. Se utilizaron las pruebas estadísticas no paramétricas de Mann-Whitney y de Kruskal-Wallis, al comprobar la distribución no normal. RESULTADOS: Se encontraron diferencias estadísticamente significativas en la distribución por géneros a favor de los hombres en el grupo Docencia frente al No Docencia, con una p < 0,01. El grupo Docencia obtuvo mejores resultados en formación y publicaciones. Las mujeres obtuvieron resultados estadísticamente significativos a su favor en la variable formación y los hombres en la experiencia. CONCLUSIONES: Para la elección de las plazas docentes en el concurso, las publicaciones y la formación tuvieron un peso importante, pero, teniendo en cuenta una perspectiva de género, un menor porcentaje de mujeres han accedido a las plazas docentes por tener menor puntuación en la categoría de experiencia

OBJECTIVE: To analyse the profile of Family Doctors who gain access to positions, both to the general quota, as well those reserved for teaching tutors of Family and Community Medicine, by means of a relocation competition. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A descriptive observational study was conducted in which 2 comparison groups were established: A Non-Teaching group that did not include Family Doctors who did not request or gain access to tutor positions, and a Teaching group with those that gained access to positions reserved for tutors. The information was obtained from the marks of the relocation competition carried out in Galicia in 2018. A total of 426 General Practitioners that entered the examination were included, of which 301 were female (70.7%) and 125 (29.3%) males. The variables were the obtaining of a position reserved for tutor, gender, and the merits considered in the competition: professional experience, training, scientific publications, and Galician language. The non-parametric statistics tests of Mann-Whitney and Kruskal-Wallis were used, after checking for non-normal distribution. RESULTS: Statistically significant differences were found in the distribution by gender in favour of males in the Teaching group compared to the Non-Teaching group (P<.01). The Teaching group obtained better results in training and publications. The females obtained statistically significant results in their favour in the training variable, and the males in experience. CONCLUSIONS: For the choice of teaching places in relocation interviews and examinations, publications and training had an important weighting; but, taking the gender perspective into account, a lower percentage of women had gained access to teaching positions due to having lower score in the experience category